3movs vs PornHat: rubric comparison
AI-generatedThis comparison covers 3movs and PornHat, two sites the directory categorizes as tubes. Neither is owned by the same company as this directory. Both were checked by the automated crawler on 2026-10-17. 3movs has an overall rubric score of 7.6 and PornHat has 7.1. Both listed free access, HTTPS and mobile-friendly pages, and neither listed a trial, price points or payment methods.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission when you sign up through them. Commissions never change a site's score or position: both come from our published rubric.
| Fact | 3movs | PornHat |
|---|---|---|
| Rubric score | 7.6/10 | 7.1/10 |
| Lowest monthly price | Not listed | Not listed |
| Free access | Yes | Yes |
| Content count stated | 382 | 10,663 |
| Payment options | 0 | 0 |
| Trust signals found | 4 | 4 |
Key differences
- Overall rubric score: 3movs scored 7.6, PornHat scored 7.1, and neither had a previous score listed.
- Content count: 3movs listed 382 items, PornHat listed 10,663. Content depth rubric scores were 5.2 and 8.1.
- Freshness: 3movs showed 0 days since its last update (rubric score 10). PornHat's update age was not listed (rubric score 3).
- Features: 3movs listed HD video and downloads. PornHat listed HD video and search filters.
- Languages: 3movs listed 1 language, PornHat listed 13.
- Usability: 3movs scored 7 and PornHat scored 8 on the rubric.
- Pricing: neither listed price points. PornHat's data included a pricing URL (pornhat.com/sites/erotic-planet/), while 3movs had none.
- Shared results: both scored 10 for free access and trust, 8 for value and 0 for payments. Both listed privacy, terms, contact and compliance notice pages.
Verdict
On rubric scores, 3movs ranks slightly higher, 7.6 to 7.1, mainly because of its freshness score of 10 against PornHat's 3. PornHat scored higher for content depth (8.1 against 5.2) and usability (8 against 7). Free access, trust, value and payments scores were identical, so the gap rests on update recency versus catalog size.